Monday, July 30, 2012

Reuters: Small Business News: Banks urge Congress to extend crisis-era deposit insurance

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Banks urge Congress to extend crisis-era deposit insurance
Jul 30th 2012, 14:15

By Jed Horowitz

NEW YORK | Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:15am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The expiration of special U.S. deposit insurance at the end of the year has spurred banks to lobby Congress to extend the program out of fear that companies will withdraw billions of dollars.

At issue is the Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) program, which insures all bank deposits in checking accounts above the $250,000 coverage already provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

TAG primarily benefits businesses and local governments that need quick access to large amounts of cash for payroll and other needs.

About $1.3 trillion of TAG-insured deposits that do not pay interest sit at large and small U.S. banks.

The TAG program was created by bank regulators and the U.S. Treasury during the 2008 financial crisis to attract cash for banks and reassure depositors that their money was safe. In 2010, Congress extended the TAG program through the end of 2012.

Without another extension, businesses are likely to shift their deposits to prime money-market accounts and other short-term alternatives.

"This program is the best deal around," said Robert Haas, senior treasury associate in charge of cash management and investments at the National Railroad Passenger Corp., the parent of Amtrak.

It addresses treasurers' two primary concerns: safety and a return on cash that comes from discounts banks give on other services in lieu of interest, he said.

If the program disappears, he will look at other options, Haas added.

A LIFELINE FOR SMALL BANKS

While the 10 largest U.S. banks hold 70 percent of TAG deposits, small banks have benefited by attracting deposits from local borrowers to fund loans that previously went to bigger banks, which are seen as safer. Community banks with under $10 billion of assets hold about $200 billion of TAG deposits - or about $23 million per bank.

"Extending TAG is our No. 1 priority this year," said Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, who insists that business lending in distressed communities depends on the program. "Ending it will have a crippling impact on any kind of full economic recovery."

The ICBA seeks a five-year extension of the program.

A bipartisan group of legislators have told constituents in the community banking world that they support the banks, but an extension is by no means certain.

The U.S. government is trying to exit many of the emergency financial programs set up during the crisis.

Time is not on the bankers' side on this issue. Only about three weeks of legislative days are left to craft an extension of the TAG insurance program before the presidential election.

Banking industry lobbyists said the best possibility is to attach a TAG extension to a bill that seems certain of passage. That bill has not yet been determined, they said.

Exacerbating the problem is that banks are feuding among themselves over the program.

Many large banks are concerned that small banks are winning deposits by assuring customers their funds are completely safe. If these banks end up failing, big banks could have to pay more money into the FDIC insurance fund. Banks are not currently charged an additional assessment on TAG deposits, but that could well change.

When directors of the American Bankers Association, a powerful trade group representing large and small banks, convened earlier this month, it was a tossup as to whether they would support a TAG extension, said people familiar with their thoughts.

By the end of the meeting, they voted almost unanimously to seek a two-year extension.

"The tipping point was new uncertainty about the economy," said James Chessen, the ABA's chief economist.

Bank executives have become spooked about a recent decline in customer loan demand due to burgeoning concerns about the euro-zone crisis, the potential year-end budget-and-tax battle known as "fiscal cliff" and new signs of a slowing U.S. economy. Extending TAG eliminates at least one element of year-end uncertainty for them, Chessen said.

WHO NEEDS IT?

Many analysts shrug their shoulders at the controversy.

Big banks don't need the cash. They have fixed the liquidity problems that plagued them during the financial crisis and cannot invest or lend their excess deposits at a rate that benefits shareholders.

"Banks don't want this money because there is nothing they can do with it," said Richard Bove, an analyst at Rochdale Securities.

Bank of New York was so awash in deposits last summer that it threatened to charge companies with more than $50 million in deposits to offset the fees the bank pays to the FDIC. The bank retreated from the plan but is now considering charging European clients who are flooding it with eurodeposits, Chief Financial Officer Todd Gibbons told Reuters this month.

Noninterest-bearing client deposits at Bank of New York totaled $63 billion at the end of the second quarter - 46 percent higher than year-ago levels.

The FDIC is "neutral" on an extension, according to a spokesman.

Last month, acting FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg told the U.S. House subcommittee on financial institutions and consumer credit that the TAG program has not had a big effect on depleting the deposit insurance fund. But he declined to speculate on how ending the program would affect banks or the economy.

FIGHTING WORDS

Bankers, meanwhile, are anxious about their lobbying efforts. They worry that credit unions, which have long been fighting to expand their ability to make business loans, will piggyback extended powers into TAG legislation.

"The senators we talk to think that marrying TAG, which the banks really want, with the Member Business Lending bill that we are lobbying for, would work," said John Magill, executive vice president of the Credit Union National Association, the chief trade group for credit unions. "TAG will not end up passing unless MBL is passed because we have been promised votes in the House and Senate. The banks don't have a bill or a vehicle to attach one to."

Representatives of the ABA and the ICBA said they adamantly oppose a deal that would give credit unions more lending latitude in exchange for a temporary extension of TAG.

"Credit unions have been wearing out their welcome in Congress by trying to attach their highly controversial legislation like a barnacle to any moving legislation," said Paul Merski, executive vice president for congressional relations at ICBA, the community banking trade group.

"They again would be the skunk at the garden party here on a needed TAG extension."

(Additional reporting by Tim McLaughlin; Editing by Jan Paschal)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: Analysis: A decade on, is Sarbanes-Oxley working?

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Analysis: A decade on, is Sarbanes-Oxley working?
Jul 30th 2012, 14:18

By Kevin Drawbaugh and Dena Aubin

Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:18am EDT

(Reuters) - When Peregrine Financial collapsed earlier this month, a nagging question resurfaced. As in the implosion of Lehman Brothers, the fall of Bernard Madoff and other cases in recent years, many asked: Where were the accountants?

That this question still arises could be seen as an indictment of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley law, enacted 10 years ago on Monday. The law was a response to accountants' failures to sound the alarm about financial misconduct at Enron Corp, WorldCom and a host of other companies.

But, lawyers and analysts say that for the most part Sarbanes-Oxley is working. It has strengthened auditing, made the accounting industry a better steward of financial standards, and fended off Enron-sized book-cooking disasters.

Yes, it has fallen short in important ways, but these failures are on a more subtle level, the experts say.

The law, signed by President George Bush on July 30, 2002, created a new auditor watchdog, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The law strengthened internal controls over companies' accounts and set stiff criminal penalties for executives who cook the books. One of its toughest provisions required corporate executives to certify the accuracy of financial statements and imposed jail terms of up to 20 years for willful violations.

While only a handful of people have faced criminal charges over false statement certification, the Securities and Exchange Commission has invoked that part of Sarbanes-Oxley to bring more than 200 civil cases.

One reason for the small number of criminal cases is that corporations have taken steps to insulate C-suite officers from culpability. Another reason is that prosecutors often choose to pursue tried-and-tested charges such as fraud when seeking to bring corporate wrongdoers to justice.

Sarbanes-Oxley also increased criminal penalties for various kinds of financial fraud. Maximum prison terms for mail fraud, for example, jumped to 20 years from five years.

These changes had a sharp deterrent effect and have helped create a mindset that "accounting shenanigans aren't going to be tolerated anymore," said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University. "You're getting much longer sentences now than you ever saw before."

Trends in companies restating their financial reports also show the law's impact. Initially, restatements rose as executives scrambled to correct past reports, peaking at 1,790 in 2006, according to research firm Audit Analytics. But after that house-cleaning period, restatements dropped sharply, leveling off at around 790 for the past two years.

PEREGRINE'S TROUBLES

In the case of Peregrine Financial, asking where the accountants were seems at first glance to be a glaringly obvious question. But a closer look reveals a more complicated situation.

In the years before the futures brokerage collapsed, Peregrine used a little-known accounting firm, Veraja-Snelling Co, which reviewed its books and vouched annually for their validity.

Veraja-Snelling, a tiny firm run out of a home in suburban Chicago, was not subject to audit inspections before 2010, when Wall Street reforms known as Dodd-Frank extended the PCAOB's authority to the auditors of broker-dealers -- too late for Peregrine.

Even if the PCAOB had that authority earlier, it is not clear that it would have made a difference. Peregrine bilked $100 million from its customers over nearly 20 years partly by forging bank statements, and there are no signs that Veraja-Snelling did anything wrong.

Peregrine and Veraja-Snelling declined to comment.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, the auditing powerhouse, did take a peek at Peregrine's books in 2000, Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Gary Gensler revealed last week. But PwC has said it was never Peregrine's auditor. Rather, it said it was hired on a limited basis to carry out procedures laid out in a settlement between Peregrine and its regulators.

'CLIENT PAYS' CONFLICT

In some ways, Sarbanes-Oxley has not done enough to change the accounting and audit industry, critics say. It did not resolve an inherent tension within the industry's "client pays" business model -- that is, an auditor's basic conflict between serving the paying client and serving the greater good.

Nor has it brought increased competition to an industry that still is an oligopoly, now dominated by the so-called Big Four firms: Ernst & Young, PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG and Deloitte. Former Enron auditor Arthur Andersen is history.

Auditors have become more independent of clients, but not entirely so. The law limited the types of consulting that accounting firms can do for their audit clients, but left them free to do lucrative tax work. It made lead audit partners rotate off accounts after five years, but let audit firms serve the same clients indefinitely.

Supporters of Sarbanes-Oxley note that it was not designed to ensure that corporate accountants should be everywhere and know everything. And they say it is unfair to expect accountants to be front-line corporate cops, standing with government regulators in the fight against fraud.

Michael Oxley, former chairman of the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, said the law he co-authored has stood the test of time.

"We've not had anything even approaching an Enron or a WorldCom or any of the other accounting scandals that we witnessed 11 years or so ago," he said in an interview.

Blaming the law for some of the recent scandals is based on a misconception about what it was supposed to do, said Oxley, a Republican. "It really had nothing to do with Lehman Brothers, AIG and the other meltdowns in 2008. It didn't really have anything to do with Bernie Madoff," he said.

Former Democratic Senator Paul Sarbanes, who is scheduled to speak on Monday night with Oxley at an event marking the law's 10th anniversary, has also been upbeat in recent remarks about the law.

SARBOX UNDER ATTACK

Approved over the resistance of much of the business community, Sarbanes-Oxley was under attack even before it took effect. Its requirement that companies pay for audits of their internal controls came in for particularly sharp criticism because of soaring costs and the provision was eventually scaled back.

Another weakening of the law was included in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups, or JOBS, Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama in April. Meant to aid small companies in raising capital and going public, the act lets small, start-up businesses ignore Sarbanes-Oxley's checks on internal controls for a few years. Obama has told the Justice Department and the SEC to keep an eye out to protect investors, but some are concerned the act opens the way for misconduct.

Another challenge to Sarbanes-Oxley is still to come. Concerned about the performance of auditors in the credit crisis, the PCAOB is considering an array of tough reforms and encountering fierce opposition from business lobbyists.

Congressional opponents of Sarbanes-Oxley have additionally tried sometimes to limit its scope by holding back the budgets and staffing of regulatory agencies like the SEC.

Lynn Turner, a former chief accountant at the SEC, one of the agencies that enforces Sarbanes-Oxley, said: "It's like any legislation. It only works if you've got a regulator and a cop enforcing it."

(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh in Washington and Dena Aubin in New York; Additional reporting by Sarah Lynch in Washington; Editing by Eddie Evans and Maureen Bavdek)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: Small caps star in Europe as macro woes hit big firms

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Small caps star in Europe as macro woes hit big firms
Jul 30th 2012, 12:01

A man walks past an information bilboard showing the evolution of the FTSE 100 index at the Swiss exchange in Zurich, August 9, 2011. REUTERS/Christian Hartmann

A man walks past an information bilboard showing the evolution of the FTSE 100 index at the Swiss exchange in Zurich, August 9, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Christian Hartmann

By Toni Vorobyova and Tricia Wright

LONDON | Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:01am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Small companies are emerging as the new star performers in Europe as investors seek strong earners, whose shares are less dependent on the macroeconomic environment than traditional large firms struggling with limp global growth.

While the EuroSTOXX 50 index of euro zone blue chips is down 0.7 percent in 2012 .STOXX50E, the STOXX Europe Small 200 .SCXP and its mid-cap equivalent .MCXP are both firmly in the black, up 9.3 and 8.6 percent, respectively - potentially heading for only the second year in a quarter of a century when small firms have surged while the large languish.

"Stock picking is going to be fundamental going forward. You are in a slow growth world, where economic outlooks are going to be very divergent so it's going to be very important to invest in the minority of companies which can grow," said Richard Plackett, who runs BlackRock's 1.4 billion sterling ($2.2 billion) UK Special Situations Fund.

Plackett said he had increased the share of small and medium-cap firms (SMIDs), in the fund to around 65 percent from under 60 percent a year ago.

"Crucially, in terms of stock picking we feel that we can add more value by looking at small and mid-caps that are immature and changing quickly rather than large caps that are mature and changing slowly," Plackett said.

Reflecting investor interest, the FTSE index of UK small caps .FTSC saw its highest quarterly trade volumes in six years in the first quarter, according to Thomson Reuters data.

Savvy - or lucky - stock pickers could have doubled their money this year by investing in, for example, Ophir Energy (OPHR.L), which has found gas in Tanzania, or Cable & Wireless, whose takeover by Vodafone (VOD.L) has been approved by EU regulators.

Merger and acquisition prospects are a major potential driver of returns for the smaller companies, and with firms sitting on large piles of cash, activity - which has been muted by the financial crisis - is expected to pick up.

As much as 88 percent of all M&A in Europe targets small and medium-sized companies, in terms of market capitalization, with the average premium paid over the last 20 years at 28 percent, according to Thomson Reuters data.

European M&A volumes fell 7 percent in the first half, year-on-year, compared with a 44 percent fall in the United States. The second half has already seen a few deals, including Japanese advertising giant Dentsu (4324.T) securing mid-cap UK-listed marketing group Aegis (AEGS.L) for 3.2 billion pounds ($5 billion).

Aegis shares jumped 46 percent when the deal was announced, to catch up with the purchase price.

LESS MACRO-DRIVEN

Research from Citi shows that over the long run about 60 percent of the share price move in SMIDs can be attributed to stock specific factors - including M&A - and only 40 percent to macroeconomic factors, while for the blue chips the balance is 20-80.

"This means that as a stock picker just getting the stock specifics of a large company right is not enough, you have to also get the macro right as well. On the other hand, for small-caps, macro isn't as important as it is for large-caps," said Lambros Papadopoulos, strategist at Citi.

The macro has proved particularly tricky recently and looks set to remain so, with the euro zone still in crisis, Spain possibly needing a bailout, global economic health looking fragile and U.S. presidential elections and budget cut plans adding further uncertainty over coming months.

On the flip side, for the smaller companies the greater focus on stock specific factors means they are better placed to benefit if they deliver solid earnings.

"Earnings momentum strategies could work better for SMIDs, because one of the most important driver for SMIDs stocks is earnings growth," said Citi's Papadopoulos.

"The strategy of buying stocks with positive earnings momentum - ahead of the rest of the market - is working well for the last five months and it has also started to work earlier for SMIDs than for large caps."

STOXX Europe Small 200 offers a long-term earnings growth rate of 10.7 percent against 6.1 for the EuroSTOXX 50, according to Thomson Reuters DataStream.

Consensus estimates point to broadly flat earnings for blue chips this year against growth of around 10-15 percent for small and mid-caps, although Papadopoulos reckons this gap will close.

For the second quarter, the bigger European companies have so far reported an average 4.7 percent year-on-year drop in earnings, against a 23.5 percent rise for small and micro companies, according to Thomson Reuters StarMine.

"Individual companies ... have this scope to grow where most others don't ... (So) some institutions are beginning to move away just from a narrow focus on liquidity and benchmarks into a slightly more bottom-up stock selection process," said Gervais Williams, fund manager at MAM.

"Generally, market volumes are falling quite badly and at the bottom end of the market there have been periods when we've seen much greater volumes of trade than we've seen in the last two years." ($1 = 0.6463 British pounds)

(Writing By Toni Vorobyova, editing by Nigel Stephenson)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Friday, July 27, 2012

Reuters: Small Business News: U.S. cuts estimates of corporate profits during 2009-2011

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
U.S. cuts estimates of corporate profits during 2009-2011
Jul 27th 2012, 13:30

By Jason Lange

WASHINGTON | Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:30am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Corporate America isn't doing quite as well as the government thought, a report by the Commerce Department showed on Friday.

The report, part of a regular annual revision to data on economic growth and national income, showed the government over-estimated pre-tax corporate profits by $233 billion between 2009 and 2011. Estimates on after-tax profits during the same period were revised lower by $155.2 billion.

The government said it changed its estimates for profits using information from the Internal Revenue Service, as well as data from the census and from public financial reports.

Profits still are still historically high, though in the first quarter of 2012 they backed down from the record high posted in the last three months of 2011.

In June, President Barack Obama called attention to record high profits when, in a gaffe, he said America's private sector was doing fine.

Obama later clarified the economy was not actually doing well, and Friday's data showed corporate profits aren't rising at quite the gang-buster pace previous data had shown.

The revisions, which covered 2009-2011, showed pre-tax profits rose 27 percent in 2010, rather than 32 percent, meaning that year's increase is no longer the biggest on record. Profits rose more in 2004, while the record increase was in 1955.

Last year, profits rose 7.3 percent, rather than the 7.9 percent increase initially reported.

In the first quarter of this year, pre-tax profits cooled to a $1.9 trillion annual rate from a $1.95 trillion rate in the fourth quarter. They also fell after taking into account taxes. The Commerce Department seasonally adjusted the quarterly data.

The revisions come a month after the Federal Reserve also made big downgrades in its estimates of the amount of cash held by corporations.

The Fed tracks liquid assets, such as cash, held by corporations outside of finance. In June, the central bank said it had underestimated those holdings by about $500 billion at the end of last year. Businesses were holding $1.7 trillion in liquid assets, rather than $2.2 trillion.

Moreover, the Fed's revisions showed that while corporations' cash horde grew in 2010, it stabilized in 2011.

The Commerce Department report also made revisions to its estimates for economic growth that showed the 2007-2009 recession was a little less severe than thought and the subsequent recovery more modest.

The economy contracted 4.7 percent during the recession, rather than 5.1 percent as previously estimated. Since then, total output has increased 5.8 percent, rather than 6.2 percent.

(Reporting by Jason Lange)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Reuters: Small Business News: NYC public advocate sues city over soaring small business fines

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
NYC public advocate sues city over soaring small business fines
Jul 27th 2012, 01:08

By Jessica Dye and Joan Gralla

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:08pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York City's public advocate, a Democratic mayoral candidate known for his liberal views, on Thursday sued the city to obtain data to determine if soaring fines are hurting small businesses.

Public Advocate Bill de Blasio said he has been stonewalled since May in his attempts to investigate whether city agencies - from the Departments of Health to Sanitation - have been guilty of "overzealous enforcement," in an apparent effort to boost how much money the city rakes in each year in fines, according to a complaint in Manhattan state court.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg ends his third and final term in 2013 and the race to replace him has already begun. De Blasio's law suit could broaden his appeal to the business community which has been wooed by another Democratic mayoral candidate, Council Speaker Christine Quinn.

"It is a smart political move by the public advocate, who is seen as far to the left, to try to move to the center by defending small businesses," said Hank Sheinkopf, a political consultant.

He said: "This is the Bill de Blasio moment - only he is in a position where he can take on the mayor this way," he said.

Political analysts said Quinn has held closely to Bloomberg's policies, though she has carved out a few specific issues, including her support for a so-called living wage bill, which boosts the wages paid by employers who get city subsidies.

New York City's public advocates probe the performance of city agencies and de Blasio said small businesses have flooded his office with complaints of being hounded for minor offenses and forced to pay "excessive" fines.

As an example of over-enforcement, de Blasio said a family-run grocery store in Brooklyn was fined $750 for violating rules about posting return policies on their cash registers.

CITY CLEANER, SAFER

Mayoral Spokesman Marc LaVorgna said the total amount of fines collected from individuals and businesses rose from $479 million in 2002 - Bloomberg's first year in office - to $817 million in 2012.

LaVorgna said 40 percent of the increase in fines came from construction violations, fire code violations, more restaurant inspections and a crackdown on illegal cigarette sales, along with other offenses.

"Restaurants are cleaner, construction sites are safer, fires have come down, and our streets are cleaner and safer than ever - that is a result of enforcing the regulations we have put in place and the laws the Council has passed," said LaVorgna.

Tickets for driving violations accounted for 60 percent or $204 million of the increase in fines in the last 10 years.

S. Elliott Henry, a 75-year old taxi driver who had just been through traffic court in lower Manhattan, said his $290 fine for turning left on Madison Avenue from 45th Street cost him three days pay.

For decades, New York City mayors, including Bloomberg, have denied setting quotas for fines to boost revenue. But de Blasio is seeking information on whether agency officials were told how many violations they should issue in a particular year.

"We need answers about what this ‘fine first, ask questions later' enforcement is doing to our small businesses and their ability to survive in this economy," De Blasio said.

The case is De Blasio v. Michael Bloomberg et al, Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, No. 12-103374.

(Editing by Anthony Boadle)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Reuters: Small Business News: Small business audits often find no more taxes due-IRS watchdog

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Small business audits often find no more taxes due-IRS watchdog
Jul 25th 2012, 20:35

WASHINGTON | Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:35pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Internal Revenue Service's watchdog criticized the agency for doing a high number of small business, "S-corporation" audits without finding additional taxes owed.

Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration Russell George, chief watchdog for the IRS, said on Tuesday the findings were troubling because they may show "the agency is spending a significant amount of resources on unproductive audits."

S-corps are flow-through company structures in which profits go directly to the owners, who pay income taxes on them. In C-corporations, which include most publicly traded businesses, profits are taxed twice, first as corporate income and again as income to investors who get dividends.

Since the 1986 tax code reform widened the differential between individual and corporate tax rates, the S-corp set-up has become increasingly popular among U.S. businesses, along with other flow-through structures.

More than 98 percent of all S-corps have $10 million or less in assets, according to George's group, known as TIGTA.

In a sample of S-corps of that size, George's unit found for the fiscal year ended September 30 that 62 percent of audits were completed without any recommendation of tax changes.

It was unclear how much money in additional taxes was collected as a result of S-corp audits, TIGTA said, acknowledging that S-corp audits can be tricky.

Still, the group recommended, the IRS should do better at scrutinizing S-corp filings to uncover owed taxes.

The IRS, in a letter acknowledging the TIGTA report, said it agreed with the watchdog's recommendations.

S-corp tax returns have surged in recent years, even as C-corp returns have plummeted in number. S-corps will file nearly 5.7 million returns in 2015, up 26 percent from 2011, IRS said.

Democratic President Barack Obama has expressed interest in possibly taxing S-corps as C-corps, though Republicans have balked at this idea.

(Reporting by Patrick Temple-West; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Tim Dobbyn)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: Indonesia's mosques seek "jazz lounge" quality for Ramadan

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Indonesia's mosques seek "jazz lounge" quality for Ramadan
Jul 25th 2012, 13:32

A man speaks into a microphone at Istiqlal mosque in Jakarta July 24, 2012.REUTERS/Beawiharta

1 of 3. A man speaks into a microphone at Istiqlal mosque in Jakarta July 24, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Beawiharta

By Olivia Rondonuwu

JAKARTA | Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:32am EDT

JAKARTA (Reuters) - Indonesia's mosques are trying to sound their best for the Ramadan fasting month, splashing out on high quality loudspeakers to woo the faithful and avoid upsetting non-Muslims.

With about 800,000 mosques serving the world's largest Muslim population, the cacophony of calls to prayer from poor quality and poorly synchronized speakers has become an increasing irritation. Senior Muslims, and even the country's vice president, have questioned whether the enthusiasm might be getting out of hand.

"One complaint includes when there are two or three (mosques) in a neighborhood and they get involved in a loudspeaker war, trying to be louder than the others," said Amidhan, a head of the highest Islamic authority, the Indonesian Ulema Council.

Some mosques are responding by seeking smoother sounding speakers. Local company V8sound is trying to tap into that market with its "Al Karim" speakers.

"The purpose of these loudspeakers is so that Indonesian mosques can have a jazz lounge standard," Harry Kissowo, the company founder and audio adviser for the presidential palace, told Reuters.

More mosques, he says, are willing to pay the 25 million rupiah ($2,600) price tag for an Al Karim, more than double the price of more commonly used sound system.

The routine use of loudspeakers for five prayer calls a day increases during Ramadan and can include a very early reminder that dawn prayers are coming up.

Analysts say there is a growing desire to show an Islamic identity in a country that has traditionally prided itself on religious moderation. More women are wearing headscarves and mass Koran recitals in big cities are on the rise.

That trend has been accompanied by concern that Indonesian society, where Muslims vastly outnumber any other religious groups, may be turning increasingly intolerant.

"If a loud call was to last only five to 10 minutes, five times a day... we would not object. The five mosques near us, though, begin the morning call to prayer at different times. For 30-45 minutes, the noise is deafening," Rosie Kameo, from the country's main Java island, wrote to the Jakarta Post newspaper.

($1 = 9455 Rupiah)

(Editing by Neil Chatterjee and Jonathan Thatcher)

(This story was corrected to fix the spelling of name in paragraph five to Kissowo)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: Management Tip of the Day: Make visual aids easy to follow

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Management Tip of the Day: Make visual aids easy to follow
Jul 25th 2012, 13:24

BOSTON | Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:24am EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - When giving a presentation with slides, creating a straightforward narrative is more useful than the repetitive use of an agenda, says Harvard Business Review.

The Management Tip of the Day offers quick, practical management tips and ideas from Harvard Business Review and HBR.org (www.hbr.org). Any opinions expressed are not endorsed by Reuters.

"When presenting, it's essential to keep your audience clued into where you are in your speech. Structure helps them follow along and receive your message.

But if you're using slides, the repetitive use of an agenda can be annoying, and even patronizing. Instead of littering your presentation visuals with this device, focus on creating a straightforward narrative.

Look at a panoramic view of your slides. Then rehearse your presentation aloud several times, moving from frame to frame. Along the way, you may want to add, delete, or shuffle slides to improve the flow.

Come up with verbal connections that link the slides together. The result: a story that's easy for you to deliver, and more importantly, easy for your audience to follow."

- Today's management tip was adapted from "When Not to Tell 'Em What You're Gonna Tell 'Em" by Jerry Weissman.

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Reuters: Small Business News: Credit unions banking on bills to lift small business lending

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Credit unions banking on bills to lift small business lending
Jul 24th 2012, 15:37

By Deborah L. Cohen

CHICAGO | Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:37am EDT

CHICAGO (Reuters) - When Phoenix entrepreneur Eric McCarthy needed money to build an ice cream business, the banks would not budge.

So McCarthy, like a growing number of small business owners, turned to a less likely source: his local credit unions.

"I tried all of the big banks, literally all of them, and was shocked and surprised that I got turned down," said McCarthy, who purchased four Baskin Robbins stores in his area this spring with a $300,000 loan from Mountain America Credit Union in Salt Lake City, Utah. "The big banks didn't want to lend a little money; they wanted to lend a lot of money."

Commercial bank loans of less than $1 million have fallen by more than 14 percent compared with 2008 levels, according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corp data. Meanwhile, credit union business lending jumped 22 percent from 2008 through the end of 2011 to $39.1 billion, according to the National Credit Union Administration, which regulates credit unions.

Nevertheless, business loans represent only 4 percent of total credit union assets of roughly $1 trillion through March, and many credit unions would like to do more. But some individual credit unions cannot -- they are nearing their legal limit. A 1998 cap restricts credit unions from lending more than 12.25 percent of their assets.

Credit unions have lobbied for more than a year to get Congress to raise the lid, but opposition from the banking industry has stalled proposed legislation. Credit unions are now focusing on legislation introduced this spring by U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, a Colorado Democrat, that would increase the lid to 27.5 percent of assets and has a better chance of passing. Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid has said the Senate would vote on a bill this session in what is expected to be a very close decision.

The American Bankers Association and others have lobbied against the change. The ABA says credit unions lack the institutional resources needed to do more commercial lending. Additionally, the tax-free status of credit unions gives them an unfair competitive advantage over banks. Credit unions operate as democratically controlled cooperative institutions, serving only their members, on a not-for-profit basis.

"Credit unions have a mission identified by Congress to serve people, primarily consumers, especially those of modest means," said Keith Leggett, an economist with the ABA. "Expansion of the cap would represent a fundamental shift or change in the credit union charter."

Leggett concedes the recession and weak economy have hurt the balance sheet of many small businesses, making it difficult for some to borrow from banks. Current lower interest rates have added to the challenge of banks' ability to make small business loans, he said.

"However, we're in a relationship business that goes beyond just a loan to other products," Leggett said, adding, "banks are making loans to every credit-worthy customer they can find."

While several credit unions suffered significant losses from bad business loans in recent years, Debbie Matz, chairman of the National Credit Union Administration, calls the cap "arbitrary."

"Credit unions tend to make very small business loans," she said. "Generally banks don't even make a loan that small," she said, noting the average credit union business loan is about $230,000. "They're filling a very important need to for small businesses."

Those charged with finding new sources of capital for small businesses say anything that creates more financing options cannot be bad.

"I strongly believe that if credit unions are given a little bit more leeway, the overall small business lending environment in the country will improve, directly and indirectly," said Rohit Arora, CEO of Biz2Credit, an online service that has helped McCarthy and other small business owners arrange financing from a variety of sources.

Not every credit union is active in small business lending. In fact, only about one-third of federally insured credit unions have commercial lending programs, according to NCUA data from the end of 2011. Many offer loans backed by the Small Business Administration. Business owners seeking commercial loans should inquire whether a program is offered at their local credit union.

"In certain instances I think it is easier to get loans from a credit union as opposed to a bank," said Steven Parker, the co-owner of an upscale dog boarding business, K-9 Resorts Daycare & Luxury Hotel in Fanwood, New Jersey.

Parker and his brother secured a credit union loan of $180,000 from Financial Resources Federal Credit Union in 2010 for working capital. They are now scouting out credit unions that can help finance new operators interested in franchising their business.

"They were offering lower rates than a traditional bank," Parker said.

(The author is a Reuters contributor. The opinions expressed are her own.)

(Editing by Jilian Mincer, Linda Stern and Matthew Lewis)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: BofA, Wells Fargo rolling out new mobile banking services

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
BofA, Wells Fargo rolling out new mobile banking services
Jul 24th 2012, 14:33

By Rick Rothacker

Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:33am EDT

(Reuters) - Bank of America Corp and Wells Fargo & Co are rolling out more retail services accessed by mobile phones, including check deposits, as the banking sector races to cut costs in a tepid economy.

Starting Thursday, Bank of America will allow customers to make deposits by submitting a photo of a check through their smart phones, the bank's online and mobile banking executive, Aditya Bhasin, said on Monday. The No. 2 U.S. bank is also rolling out a service allowing customers to send money to other individuals using their email address or mobile numbers, as well as expanding a coupon service that can be used by mobile customers.

Wells Fargo launched its mobile check deposit service earlier this year and will gradually expand it across the United States by the end of the year, said Brian Pearce, head of the retail mobile channel at the bank. Earlier this year, the No. 4 U.S. bank launched its money transfer service, which is part of a joint venture between Wells, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase & Co called clearXchange.

The latest roll-outs mean two of the largest U.S. banks are adding mobile banking services that are increasingly popular with consumers. Combined, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have nearly 20 million active mobile banking users across the United States.

Executives at both banks stress they are focused on evolving customer needs, but banks for decades have also been looking to cut costs by moving transactions to ATMs, online banking sites and now mobile devices.

Banks are hoping new mobile services will eventually cost less than handling transactions in branches, even if there are high upfront costs, said Peter Olynick, card and payments leader at Carlisle & Gallagher Consulting Group.

Bank of America Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan has said that increasing mobile use can help the bank scale back on branches and therefore cut costs.

"It is just a much more efficient and frankly strong service model," he said during the bank's second-quarter earnings conference call last week.

The bank previously said it plans to eliminate 750 branches over the next few years and, in the past year, it has quietly shed about 9 percent of its ATMs. The bank now has about 5,600 branches and 16,200 ATMs.

Bank of America spokeswoman Tara Burke said the bank's ATM numbers declined as it removed machines at Simon Property Group Inc malls and in Valero Energy Corp convenience stores. Many of these locations did not allow for check deposits or have 24-hour access, she said.

While the bank's ATM numbers are shrinking, its total active mobile users increased by about 600,000 to 10.3 million in the second quarter of this year from the first quarter.

Mobile payments can also help Bank of America defend its business from non-bank rivals such as eBay Inc's PayPal Inc, which are increasingly encroaching on banks' payments businesses, including person-to-person transactions, Carlisle & Gallagher's Olynick said.

"The banks that are not as aggressive are at risk to other entrants and other banks that are going aggressively after this," Olynick said.

Rivals JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup Inc, for example, already offer the check deposit service.

"Mobile deposit capture has been really positively received," said Beth Robertson, director of payments research at consulting firm Javelin Strategy & Research. "It makes things so much easier for consumers and small business."

Banks are keen to defend their position in the payments processing business, which can generate big revenue for them. Banks make about $14 billion of annual fees from processing debit cards for merchants, Javelin estimates. Credit cards are even more lucrative, with interchange fees paid in 2011 by merchants to Visa Inc and MasterCard Inc banks coming in at $22.75 billion, according to industry publication The Nilson Report.

AN INTEGRAL PART OF LIFE

In another service available for mobile customers, Bank of America is expanding a coupon program that allows customers to receive discounts from retailers by clicking on offers sent directly to their online banking accounts. The bank began testing BankAmeriDeals in January and is now making it available across the United States by early August, Bhasin said.

The strategy offers discounts to customers, while also encouraging customers to use their Bank of America debit and credit cards.

"There are more rewards for them and more benefits for us as well," Bhasin said.

Meanwhile, Wells Fargo, which has 8.5 million active mobile users, started allowing customers to deposit checks with their phones in May, Pearce said. It is now available in six states, plus California's Bay Area, and should be nationwide by the end of the year.

The bank in May also unveiled its own person-to-person money transfer service, which allows customers to send money to other individuals using a mobile number or email address, rather than an account number. The bank currently allows customers to send money to Wells Fargo and Bank of America customers, but will add JPMorgan recipients by year's end.

Bank of America money transfer service allows customers to send money to individuals with accounts at all three banks, plus others. JPMorgan said it has not rolled out a clearXchange program yet.

Banks are increasingly finding that mobile banking is critical for interacting with their customers, Wells Fargo's Pearce said.

"This mobile lifestyle has emerged," he said. "People take their mobile devices everywhere they go and it's become this integral part of their life."

(Reporting By Rick Rothacker in Charlotte, North Carolina; editing by Andre Grenon)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: Management Tip of the Day: Don't dismiss critics of change

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Management Tip of the Day: Don't dismiss critics of change
Jul 24th 2012, 14:26

BOSTON | Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:26am EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - When trying to implement change, don't just dismiss out of hand the people who seem to be resistant to new ideas. Try to understand their concerns, says Harvard Business Review.

The Management Tip of the Day offers quick, practical management tips and ideas from Harvard Business Review and HBR.org (www.hbr.org). Any opinions expressed are not endorsed by Reuters.

"Not everyone will be excited about change. People who resist are often perceived as inflexible obstacles to overcome. But don't think of them simply as barriers to success.

While some people do undermine change efforts, it is shortsighted to think everyone will, or even want to.

Try to understand why people are resistant. Ask what they are concerned about and listen to their criticism. Doing so may uncover valid concerns that need to be addressed. Put everyone's perspectives to use and make resisters a part of the solution."

- Today's management tip was adapted from the "Harvard ManageMentor Online Module: Change Management."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Small Business News: As China costs rise, technology lures US factories home

Reuters: Small Business News
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
As China costs rise, technology lures US factories home
Jul 24th 2012, 14:26

By Scott Malone and Ernest Scheyder

SCHENECTADY, N.Y./NEW YORK | Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:26am EDT

SCHENECTADY, N.Y./NEW YORK (Reuters) - Seesmart Inc (SEST.PK), a small California lighting company, used to make all of its LED products in China, but last year that started to change.

Frustrated by expensive and slow shipping and wanting more control over the manufacturing process, the 15-year-old company started building factories in Simi Valley, California, and Crystal Lake, Illinois.

"When we do the numbers we're actually ahead manufacturing here instead of paying for air freight and dealing with the logistical issues that we're having in China," said Raymond Sjolseth, the company's president and co-founder.

With just $11 million in revenue last year, Seesmart is a tiny company, but it is one of many manufacturers of all sizes - from Master Lock (FBHS.N) to blue-chips General Electric Co (GE.N) and Caterpillar Inc (CAT.N) - that are expanding production in the United States.

After decades roaming the world in search of lower costs, U.S. manufacturers are finding that factories at home can compete with China, India, Mexico and other low-cost countries.

To be sure, labor-intensive industries like clothing and electronics, which are heavily dependent on hand assembly, are seen as unlikely to come back to the United States in a major way. And the trickle of returning jobs is far from a flood.

But higher transportation costs and wage inflation in China could drive more production back to the United States.

Prime candidates for return are bulky, heavy items. GE has shifted production of appliances from Mexico and China to Louisville, Kentucky, partly due to rising shipping costs. The new plant that Caterpillar is building near Athens, Georgia, will employ about 1,400 and make small bulldozers and excavators.

As manufacturers have learned to run factories with fewer workers - whose jobs consist of keeping high-cost, high-speed machines running smoothly, rather than assembling goods by hand - they have found that wages are a less critical issue in choosing a factory site.

Caterpillar, which has announced nine new plants or expansion projects in the past year alone, said it has chosen to grow in the United States both to meet local demand and because it has been able to find a steady supply of workers able to run the advanced equipment that powers its plants.

A survey by the Hackett Group Inc (HCKT.O) consultancy found that 46 percent of executives at European and North American manufacturing companies said they were considering returning some production to the United States from China, while another 27 percent said they were actively planning for or are in the midst of such a shift.

In the face of continued high unemployment, outsourcing and offshoring have become potent issues with U.S. voters. In the race for the White House, President Barack Obama, a Democrat, has called attention to job cuts made by private equity firm Bain Capital, formerly run by Mitt Romney, the presumed Republican nominee.

Despite the gloom, there has been a slight rise in U.S. factory employment. Some 11.95 million Americans worked in production jobs as of May, up 4 percent from the sector's recessionary low in January 2010.

Manufacturing gained its reputation as a key to the U.S. middle class, in part thanks to its historically unionized work force. However, companies including Caterpillar and the Detroit automakers have succeeded in winning concessions in labor negotiations that include two-tier wage structures that provide substantially lower wagers for the newest workers.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

For a graphic on the closing cost gap in manufacturing:

link.reuters.com/taw39s

For a story on U.S. Olympic uniforms being made in China:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

At Seesmart, shifting production from China to the United States is cutting logistics costs by about 30 percent as it no longer needs to fly merchandise across the Pacific. Products can also be made and shipped to customers more quickly, Sjolseth said.

"The LED business involves a very compulsive buy, and the client can't tolerate long lead times," he said. "So if you're not delivering in four to six weeks, it's not going to happen. You're going to lose the deal and they're going somewhere else."

Higher wages have not been a roadblock for the company because its automated factories mean that labor costs represent less than 2 percent of the cost to manufacture lighting.

"Are our labor costs higher in the U.S. versus China? Yes, but in our case the total cost to produce our U.S. units is lower when all factors are calculated," said Sjolseth. The company today makes 20 percent of its products in the United States, a number it aims to push to 75 percent by the end of next year.

NARROWING COST GAP

The falling share of wages in total costs also played a role in a new battery plant opened by General Electric in Schenectady, New York, this month.

"With all the manufacturing technology we have, labor is a relatively small component" of costs, said GE's chief executive, Jeff Immelt. "That's different today than it was 10 years ago."

The new plant will employ 450 people, a slice of the 14,500 positions the largest U.S. conglomerate has added since 2009. It employs 301,000 people worldwide and 131,000 in the United States.

The plant is highly automated, with high-tech machines processing the ceramic forms that surround the batteries. Some processes are still done by hand; during a recent tour of the site, workers were applying a layer of carbon paint to the cells with paint brushes.

The hand-painting is a technique that GE researchers used in developing the batteries, and it remains a more reliable approach than applying the carbon by machine, said Prescott Logan, general manager of GE's newly formed energy storage technologies unit. But GE is working on a way to reliably automate the process.

"There are a lot of parts of that factory that will look very different five years from now," Logan said.

Rising wages in emerging markets and higher shipping costs are also closing the cost gap between developing markets and the United States.

In 2005 it cost 45 percent less to make electric motors for automobile windshield wipers in China and ship them to the United States, rather than make them domestically, according to an analysis by AlixPartners.

Today, the Chinese motor costs only 18 percent less than a U.S.-made model. The consultancy forecasts that by 2015 the Chinese motor will cost just 9 percent less, due to rising wages and shipping costs and an appreciation in the Chinese yuan versus the U.S. dollar.

The study also looked at costs for motors made in India and Mexico and found they had risen, though not as dramatically as in China.

"If you go back to the heyday of outsourcing to China, at that time with the exchange rates and the ocean freight it was pretty hard to go wrong from a cost standpoint," said Steve Maurer, a managing director at AlixPartners who specializes in manufacturing efficiency.

"Now that costs in China are increasing ... people are stepping back and saying, 'We need to reevaluate this.'"

(Editing by Patricia Kranz and Leslie Adler)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.